Printed from smellbook.com/smells/wood-smoke. This printout keeps the entry for Wood Smoke itself: its description, reference card, Connections, questions, evidence, related smells, record details, states, names and citation. It leaves out your own notes, the map, the lists of paths, routes, stories and fragrance directions, and the lists headed “Also linked to” (other entries that share its place or material) and “Linked from”; they are on the page online. The entries this one links to are still printed under Connections and Related smells.
Links SmellBook records for this entry: molecules, related smells and comparisons. EDITORIAL links are chosen by SmellBook editors and VERIFIED links come from VERIFIED claims. Nothing here is a ranking, and a molecule is not presented as the cause of the smell.
QUESTIONS ABOUT WOOD SMOKE
Wood Smoke, question by question
What does wood smoke smell like? EDITORIAL
Wood smoke smells dry, warm and smoky, with a sharp, slightly bitter edge and soft woody sweetness underneath. Up close it can sting and feel dense; at a distance it is mellow and almost pleasant. The smell clings to hair, wool and clothing long after the fire is out. It is close to the broader campfire experience, though narrower and more focused on the smoke itself.
People meet it near fireplaces and wood stoves in cold weather, around bonfires and campfires, and drifting over villages and rural lanes on autumn and winter evenings.
One VERIFIED scientific claim from one published source is recorded for this entry: Phenolic odorants in hardwood smoke. This claim says only what its source supports, in the scope shown with it.
4 molecules are named in this claim; see the evidence for the role the claim gives them. Each molecule this claim names has only the role the claim states; one molecule is not the whole smell. Where a molecule is listed as a reported volatile, the claim does not say it shapes the smell.
How do people describe it, and what is it compared with? EDITORIAL
Wood Smoke is an atmospheric experience; intensity and ventilation strongly change how it is perceived.
Answers marked EDITORIAL are written by SmellBook editors to describe the experience and add no scientific fact. Answers marked VERIFIED point to claims on published sources, checked against each source's own summary where one was available (each claim's page says how); what each claim supports is in its own text and scope.
01WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYSVERIFIED
What the evidence supports
This one VERIFIED scientific claim, from one source, covers the chemistry reported. How the scientific evidence was produced: odour analysis with human assessors. This claim says only what its source supports, in the scope shown with it.
What is editorial
The description, smell words, associations and related smells on this page are written by SmellBook's editors and labelled EDITORIAL or CULTURAL; a claim below does not make them VERIFIED.
A gas chromatography–olfactometry study of condensed mixed-hardwood smoke found phenolic compounds such as guaiacol, 4-methylguaiacol and 4-methylsyringol among its most potent odorants, alongside compounds such as 2,3-butanedione.
Supports the odorants of one condensed hardwood smoke studied for food smoking; open fires, other woods and burning conditions can differ.
How this was found: Odour analysis with human assessors. People smelled the separated compounds or the material itself (for example gas chromatography–olfactometry, dilution analysis, recombination or a sensory panel). Source: primary study; sensory or perception work.
Each molecule is named by the claim shown after it. Each molecule named here has only the role the claim states; one molecule is not the whole smell. About molecules in SmellBook
Each step is a relationship SmellBook editors recorded in the knowledge graph, named as it is published there. Paths are not ranked or personalised, and they do not mean the smells smell alike.
Each step is a molecule that a VERIFIED claim names for both smells, in whatever role the claims state. Sharing a molecule does not mean two smells smell alike.
CULTURAL: This entry's associations depend on context, language, memory or culture; its description and smell words are editorial. It says nothing about research or historical evidence; evidence for this entry is shown separately: VERIFIED.
ATLAS POSITION021 / 200
MILESTONEIconic 100
PRIMARY CATEGORYPhenomena & Weather
PUBLIC TYPEPhenomenon
PROFILE STATUScomplete
Names and identity for Wood Smoke
How this entry is identified and named, for citing it or matching it with other records.
@misc{smellbook_wood_smoke_r4,
author = {{SmellBook}},
title = {Wood Smoke},
year = {2026},
note = {SmellBook Public Atlas, revision 4, 2026-10-06, smellbook:smell:wood-smoke},
url = {https://smellbook.com/smells/wood-smoke}
}
TY - ENCYC
ID - smellbook-wood-smoke-r4
TI - Wood Smoke
AU - SmellBook
T2 - SmellBook Public Atlas
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
ET - revision 4
UR - https://smellbook.com/smells/wood-smoke
N1 - SB-0021; smellbook:smell:wood-smoke; resolver https://smellbook.com/id/smell/wood-smoke
ER -
The citation names revision 4 of 2026-10-06, so a reader can tell exactly which version was cited. Citing records what was read; it does not grant a licence.
PROFILE NOTE
Wood Smoke is an atmospheric experience; intensity and ventilation strongly change how it is perceived.