SmellBook
Menu

EVIDENCE COVERAGE

How many smell profiles have VERIFIED evidence

This page counts four things: the published smell profiles, how many of them have at least one VERIFIED claim, how many have none recorded yet, and how many VERIFIED claims there are in all.

Coverage is not a confidence or quality score.

Coverage describes whether public records are linked to VERIFIED claims and registered sources. It is not a scientific-confidence, quality, importance or ranking score.

The counts

200 published smell profiles in the encyclopedia.

145 profiles have at least one VERIFIED claim: a statement resting on a registered source. For 3 of them, every VERIFIED claim is one that could not be checked against the source text, because no abstract or other summary of the source was available.

55 profiles have no VERIFIED claim recorded yet.

166 VERIFIED claims recorded across all profiles. One profile can have several.

What “no VERIFIED claim recorded yet” means

No VERIFIED claim recorded yet means only that SmellBook has not yet registered a checked source whose own words support a narrow statement about that smell. It does not mean:

All 55 of these profiles have been searched; no suitable source has been found yet. Each search is recorded with its date and reason.

By category

A profile can belong to more than one category, so the category totals add up to more than 200. Categories are listed in SmellBook's usual order, not by number of gaps.

By type

Each profile has one or more public types: what kind of thing the smell is. A profile can have more than one type, so the type totals add up to 268, not 200. Types are listed in SmellBook's usual order, not by number of gaps.

By milestone

The milestones group profiles by when they were published, using their record numbers. They are not progress stages, and their numbers are not meant to be compared with each other.

Open research questions

For every profile without a VERIFIED claim, SmellBook records one open research question: what kind of source could support a narrow statement about that smell. The agenda lists open research questions, not findings. It names no sources and makes no claim; an answer enters SmellBook only through source intake with a checked citation and classified rights. The agenda data lists entries alphabetically by line and entry; that order, like any order on a page, is not a priority or importance ranking.

Open questions by kind of evidence sought

Searched; no suitable source found yet

55 of these profiles have been searched without finding a qualifying source yet: a source whose own text supports a narrow claim. Each search is listed with its date and reason in the agenda data. A recorded search found no source whose own text supports a narrow smell claim. It does not mean the entry is wrong, and it is not a score or ranking. The question stays open on the research agenda.

Why searches have not found a source so far

Each number counts the profiles with at least one recorded search that ended for that reason. A profile can have several searches with different reasons, so these numbers add up to more than 55. They describe why searches have not found a source; they are not a priority order.

The data behind this page

New sources enter through a documented intake: citation checked, content rights classified, claim drafted, then registered. Gaps show where no VERIFIED claim links to a profile. They are not a quality, importance or priority score, and a profile without a claim is not wrong.

Source-checking worksheet

The agenda as a spreadsheet, with columns for a researcher to record a checked citation.

CSV ↗

Evidence research agenda

Open questions per entry, the evidence class sought and suitable source kinds.

JSON ↗

Source intake and gaps

Intake workflow, queue, source rights and evidence gaps.

JSON ↗

Coverage records

Profile, source and claim linkage coverage.

JSON ↗