SmellBook
Menu

SRC-TOMATOPASTE-1990 · PRIMARY

Quantitative and sensory studies on tomato paste volatiles

Ron G. Buttery, Roy Teranishi, Louisa C. Ling & Jean G. Turnbaugh · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Lifecycleactive
Published1990-01
DOI10.1021/jf00091a074
Used by1 verified claim
CITATION CHECK

Title, journal, date and first author checked against the publisher’s Crossref record on 2026-10-03 (check run 37117547531). Publication date confirmed to the month. The publisher reported no open licence for the work. SmellBook publishes only the citation and its own claim, never the work’s text.

LIFECYCLE REVIEW

Reviewed 2026-10-03 · corrections 0

TOPICS
tomato pasteprocessingodour thresholdsdimethyl sulfide
CLM-TOMATOPASTE-001

How processing changes tomato aroma ↗

Compared with fresh tomatoes, tomato paste had (Z)-3-hexenal and hexanal more than 400 times lower and β-damascenone several-fold higher, and the compounds judged most important to its aroma included dimethyl sulfide, β-damascenone, β-ionone, 3-methylbutanal, methional and eugenol.

Tomato paste, judged from concentrations and odour thresholds; sauces add other ingredients.
EXTERNAL RECORD

Open the publisher / DOI record ↗

Permanent identifier smellbook:source:tomato-paste-volatiles-1990 · Graph record (JSON)

Dataset history In the SmellBook dataset since Strategy Phase 389.